Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List [pdf]

[PDF]

Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List – Stanford …

Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List David Mazieres and Eddie Kohler` New York University University of California, Los Angeles http://www.mailavenger.org/

”Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List” is an actual – Vox

The paper above, titled ”Get me off your fucking mailing list,” has been accepted by the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology. …

Journal accepts bogus paper requesting removal from

In line with the highest academic standards, Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List had been subjected to rigorous, anonymous peer review. “They told me to add some more recent references and do a

Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List – PDF

Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List David Mazières and Eddie Kohler New York University University of California, Los Angeles Abstract off off off mailing 1 Introduction off

Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List by David Mazières

Get me off Your Fucking Mailing List has 2 ratings and 1 review. Manny said: Exercises1. If you have not already done so, download and read this 2005 p

3.5/5

Get me off your fucking mailing list | MetaFilter

’Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List’ is an actual science paper accepted by a journal. Original Source.

Get Me Off Your F*cking Mailing List, The Penis As A

“Get me off your fucking mailing list,” likewise. Over a hundred papers automatically generated by a computer. Ditto. The piece of shit that launched the anti-vax movement? Goddamn motherfucking peer reviewed and published. These have all been published in allegedly academic journals. The first

Journal Accepts Profanity-Laden Joke Paper | Inside Higher Ed

The paper was written in 2005 and never meant for publication. But it appears “Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List” has found a potential spot in the International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology.

”Get Me Off Your Fucking Mailing List” Is the Easiest

The ”Get me off your fucking mailing list” article is the worst of the bunch, of course, because it doesn’t even take a science hobbyist to realize that it does not merit publishing.